Posted by Jim Farley on Mon, Mar 18, 2013
Posted by Jim Farley on Tue, Mar 05, 2013
Last week we ran a commentary on a New York Times article about the success of self funding for small and mid-size group employee benefit plans. The employers quoted found self funding to be most effective. There were also negative comments from Obama administration and state level regulators in the article. Their negativity was based on the incorrect assumption that the only employers that would benefit from self funding would be young, healthy groups and their fear that these young, healthy groups would choose self funding over their insurance exchanges which will begin in 2014.
Read More
Posted by Jim Farley on Tue, Feb 26, 2013
I last reported on a New York Times article on small and mid-sized employers opting to self insure and the regulators fear that this would drive up the cost of coverage in the new Insurance Exchanges created under the Accountable Care Act (ACA). The regulators fear was that groups with young, healthy employees will self insure leaving the Exchanges with the sick and older population.
Read More
Posted by Jim Farley on Mon, Feb 25, 2013
An article in the February 17, 2013 edition of the New York Times discussed small and mid-sized employers choosing to move from insured plans to self insured plans with stop loss coverage in response to the Accountable Care Act (ACA) otherwise known as Health Care Reform or Obamacare. Consultants and experts in the group employee benefit business began predicting the movement from insured plans to self insured plans as soon as the ACA went into effect so the fact that this is actually occurring is no surprise. According to the article, the employers who were quoted have considered the move to self insurance to be successful.
Read More
Posted by Jim Farley on Thu, Dec 27, 2012
Medicare has revamped its payments to hospitals based on quality indicators. That is the good news. The bad news is that the rewards/penalties involved, as they are currently constituted, are probably not worth the time it would take a hospital to seriously consider the program. The reward for good results is an extra 1% reimbursement. The penalty is a 2% cutback. There are two measures currently being considered, value based health care and readmission rate. If we assume the reimbursement for an average hospital admission for a Medicare patient is $50,000 (which is probably way too high), the penalty could be as high as $1,000. However the revenue for the readmission is likely to be 10 or 20 times the amount of the penalty. It would seem to me that if I were the CFO of hospital it would take a lot more penalty than 2% to create the need for a behavior change.
Of the 25 hospitals in the greater Cleveland area showing currently on Medicare website, only 4 actually received a reward and the biggest reward was only 0.18%.
There are three big problems with the hospital quality programs under Medicare and Health Reform.
- The measurements themselves are being created by special interest groups.
- The amount of the penalties and rewards will not change behavior.
- Patients have not shown much interest in paying attention to the underlying ratings or implications. The biggest driver of choice of hospitals by patients is where their doctor recommends they go. With hospitals owning far more than half of all doctor practices, the doctors standardly recommends the hospitals that own the practices that employ them.
In the coming months we are going to hear a lot about the Medicare quality programs,
Accountable Care Organizations, and Patient Centered Medical Homes. These are all included as part of health care reform. They may sound good in theory but do not expect much out of them. Estimates of savings from all of these programs combined might affect a the cost of family coverage by $300 which is not much when you compare it to the $16,500 per year family coverage will cost in 2013. It is going to take a lot more than this for health reform to deliver on the promise implied by its name, the Affordable Care Act. That kind of creativity is going to have to come from plans. The best
benefit savings solutions will not come from those with a vested interest in the current system.
Posted by J.P. Farley Corporation on Wed, Dec 19, 2012

Thanks to everyone who joined J.P. Farley Corporation for our educational webinar on find Success Beyond the PPO Network. Jason Smith and Robert Bernath provided a wealth of information in this presentation that looks towards innovation to tackle the cost problem for group employee benefit plans.
Read More
Posted by J.P. Farley Corporation on Wed, Mar 07, 2012

Financial advisors often tell people that it is important that they not spend more than they earn. No matter what kind of discounts or price cuts a person gets on the items they buy, what is most important is the big picture: not sending out more money than they have in their coffers. After all, what good does it do to point to the discount you were offered if you have spent more than you really needed to spend?
Read More
Posted by J.P. Farley Corporation on Wed, Feb 29, 2012

Flushing unused prescription drugs down the sink or toilet is one of the three medical disposal methods recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (see our previous post). While safe when used as prescribed, many prescription drugs can be harmful and even fatal – especially to children and pets -- when ingested by someone for whom the medicine was not prescribed. Certain potentially dangerous medications are even accompanied by instructions to flush unused portions to immediately remove possible risk of unintentional poisoning.
Read More
Posted by J.P. Farley Corporation on Tue, Feb 28, 2012

Unintentional poisoning is the second leading cause of accidental death in the U.S., according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Every day nearly 100 Americans die from unintentional poisoning and another 2,000 are treated in hospital emergency rooms. While child-proof packaging has reduced the number of children who are killed or injured by unintentional poisoning, more than 45,000 children die from unintentional poisoning every year; the majority from ingesting prescription drugs intended for another family member.
Read More
Posted by J.P. Farley Corporation on Mon, Feb 27, 2012

While the failure of the congressional “super committee” to reach an agreement triggers a 2% across-the-board cut to Medicare, this is thought to be far less than the $500 to $700 billion lawmakers on the panel were discussing prior to their deadline. Physicians and hospitals will feel the impact but the $123 billion that will need to be cut over the next 10 years is minimal compared to cuts imposed by deficit reduction legislation enacted in recent years.
Read More